Chuyển đến nội dung chính

Bayview Community Based Transportation Plan

Bayview Community Based Transportation Plan
By Bradley Dunn

54 Felton in the Bayview District

We are thrilled to share the draft Bayview Community Based Transportation Plan – the culmination of two years of collaboration and partnership with the Bayview community to improve transportation. The Bayview transportation plan represents a commitment to a new approach to addressing transportation planning in the Bayview district. The actions and strategies we’re planning to implement in the neighborhood bring to bear a wide variety of agency resources to address long-standing concerns in the community. As we share this plan, we’re eager to get public feedback and excited to present the plan at our first February SFMTA Board meeting.

Over the past two years, we interacted with more than 4,000 residents, attended  more than 50 community meetings and events, collected more than 2,300 surveys and worksheets, and spent almost 300 SFMTA staff hours in the Bayview. This has resulted in a draft plan that spells out actions and strategies for tackling the issues that are affecting people’s access to and from Bayview, with $3.63 million worth of programmed and prioritized transportation investments from the SFMTA, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Bayview community. The Plan identifies:

  • Quick-Build Projects - We are committing $600,000  to Quick Build projects that can be built in the 2020 calendar year. An example is Williams avenue, where we will calm traffic and increase pedestrian safety around the Bayview’s only grocery store. You can learn more about project locations and details here.
  • Participatory Budgeting -  We ran a $750,000 Participatory Budgeting process in the Bayview. In this democratic process, residents come up with ideas, turn them into proposals, and vote on what to fund. The process will fund three new Transit Assistants that will provide an unarmed safety presence on the 29 Sunset, 44 O’Shaughnessy, and T-Third.
  • A 5-year Investment Plan - We are committing $2,280,000 to a 5-year investment plan that was developed and prioritized using resident input only. More than 40 pedestrian safety improvement and more than 10 projects to improve access to transit.
  • Policy Recommendations – Our policy recommendations try to give voice to community needs and support future community advocacy when they could not be included in the plan.

[embedded Issuu here] 

To implement this new approach, we needed to map out ways to improve access for Bayview residents – but when planning has been at the root of so much damage to the Bayview, how do we use planning as a remedy?  We started with deep conversations with leaders and elders across the Bayview. Here is what they said to us: 

  • The Bayview is over-planned and under-delivered – There have been more than 20 transportation-related plans in the last 10 years in the Bayview. People are tired of being asked about what they need when they’ve already been asking for years. They want results.
  • People feel like their voices don’t matter - Residents too often feel like they’re being shoehorned into a pre-determined process. Or, even worse, that projects in their community aren’t being done on their behalf, and that increasing displacement pressure means they might not be around to enjoy the benefit once delivered.
  • The most vulnerable are the first left out – The Bayview residents  most vulnerable to transportation challenges (youth, seniors, residents with disabilities, and residents in affordable housing) are often the hardest to reach and the least represented when gathering resident input.
  • The SFMTA shouldn’t expect to reach people on its own - Bayview’s residents rarely have the extra time to come to a Tuesday evening open-house workshop. For residents to trust our plan, they needed to define it, and the SFMTA needed to find convenient and accessible ways for the community to generate and consider ideas.  

A truly community-based plan required the SFMTA to learn and address these points. Our community outreach strategies to develop an inclusive, responsive, and representative plan included:

  • Statement of Intent - We needed a clear and concise promise to the public to  demonstrate our commitment to a different approach with the Bayview CBTP. We took what we learned from our community interviews and held a facilitated dialogue with SFMTA leadership; this became our Statement of Intent, with the key promises of Accountability, Transparency, Preserving the Community’s Voice, and City Coordination.
  • The Community’s Voice Comes First - Throughout our work, we sought to emphasize the voices and lived experiences of Bayview’s residents. Just as important as finding solutions for the future is making sure that the people experiencing the problem are the ones defining it . All our proposed projects were conceived, developed, and prioritized by resident input and voices.
  • Community Partnerships - We directly contracted with five community-based organizations for the Bayview CBTP: BMAGIC, Hunters Point Family, CYC, El Centro, and BAYCAT. Our public outreach strategy, our planning process, and all of our project materials were developed jointly with this team. For our best example check out the Next Stop documentary filmed by the Girls 2000 program & BAYCAT.
  • Community-defined Equity Index - To help represent those we couldn’t reach, we developed an Equity Index – a map showing the concentration of vulnerable residents across the Bayview that could be used to prioritize projects. The community defined how “vulnerable residents” was measured, ensuring the priorities of the community determined the Equity Index scores.

What’s Next? 

The SFMTA Board of Directors will consider adopting the draft plan in February. Between now and then, we welcome all invitations to present the plan before community organizations, events, and meetings in the months of January and February. To have an SFMTA staff member attend your group meeting, please contact project manager Christopher Kidd. At these meetings, we hope to continue the conversation with Bayview residents to ensure the plan is fully representative of the community’s voice and needs.

Our work in the Bayview will be ongoing, as we implement the Bayview CBTP. We have a Bayview CBTP survey to provide feedback on the draft plan. The feedback the survey will be incorporated to these projects as they move forward.



Published January 17, 2020 at 04:28AM
https://ift.tt/30zGOOE

Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

Review sách Hackers IELTS Reading

Sách “Hackers IELTS” phù hợp cho bạn đang muốn tự ôn luyện tại nhà nhưng không biết nên chọn sách nào học cho hiệu quả và khoa học. Bộ sách “Hackers IELTS” được các chuyên gia tin tưởng giới thiệu cho những bạn chưa biết gì về IELTS, không biết cấu trúc đề thi IELTS gồm những phần nào,…thì “Hackers IELTS” rất phù hợp với những đối tượng này. Xem thêm bài viết đang được quan tâm nhất: Review sách... Bạn hoàn toàn có thể đạt 6.5 IELTS trở lên là điều không khó nếu như bạn biết cách sắp xếp lộ trình học sao cho logic và thêm việc lựa chọn 1 vài tài liệu thực sự hay và dễ học, thì mọi nút thắt đều được gỡ bỏ. Hàng nghìn độc giả đã mua và nêu cảm nhận rất tốt về bộ sách này chính là minh chứng cho việc “Hackers IELTS” sẽ giúp bạn làm được điều mà bạn mong ước. Review sách Hackers IELTS Reading Nội dung chính BOOK REVIEW “Hackers IELTS” Giới thiệu chung Ưu điểm Bố cục mỗi bài gồm Khuyết điểm Kết luận BOOK REVIEW  “Hackers IELTS” Tên sách: Hackers IELTS Reading Nhà xuất bản: Nhà xuất bản ...

[ACE THE TEST] GIẢI ĐỀ WRITING NGÀY 09/07/2022

Task 1: The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011.  The graphs show information on various garbage disposal techniques used in a certain nation between 1960 and 2011. Overall, the quantity of paper, food, and other garbage that was disposed of significantly decreased throughout the time period. Contrarily, a greater proportion of plastic, wood, and food was discarded by consumers. An additional point is that the disposal of other things stayed fairly steady. Initially, a quarter of paper was thrown away in 1960, but in 2011 this percentage decreased by 10%. Concerning textiles, this sector likewise had a minor drop of 6% (from 17% to 11%) during the same time period. Additionally, in 2011 people eliminated 3 times less additional waste than the original figure of 13%. Furthermore, it is evident that compared to 2010, the amount of plastic and food waste increased by nearly 10% in 2011. Additionally, consumers d...

TỔNG HỢP BÀI MẪU IELTS WRITING QUÝ 2/2022 

Đây là tổng hợp đề thi thật IELTS Writing Quý 2/2022 và kèm bài giải cùng phân tích chi tiết, các bạn đã đăng kí và chuẩn bị thi trong quý 3/2022 cùng tham khảo và luyện tập thật kĩ nhé. Ngày 07/05/2022 Task 1: The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.  The two maps detail the town of Pebbleton 20 years in the past and the present day. Overall, Pebbleton has grown exponentially with the expansion of road infrastructure , as well as the building of additional dwellings and recreational amenities , changing the town into a more urbanised one. Initially, Pebbleton was an undeveloped peninsula connected to the mainland through Roadbridge, which was the only route to get to school on the opposite side of the river 20 years ago. A playing field ran horizontally along Old Ford Road in the central section, and a film studio filled the sout...