Chuyển đến nội dung chính

Geary Transit Lanes Proving Their Worth

Geary Transit Lanes Proving Their Worth
By Amy Fowler

The verdict is in: transit lanes on Geary Boulevard are keeping riders moving apace, despite citywide trends of increasing traffic.

Muni has remained critical for San Franciscans making essential trips throughout the pandemic. The Temporary Emergency Transit Lanes program quickly installed temporary transit lanes on key routes across San Francisco to help preserve the travel time gains we saw during the early days of the pandemic. Since emergency transit lanes were installed in the Richmond neighborhood last winter, we have been able to lock in 50-75% of those travel time savings for 38 Geary customers where transit lanes were added.

Image of Geary Boulevard showing transit lanes from 27th to 35th ave and from 11th Ave to Stanyan

Emergency transit lanes and other transit improvements were installed along segments of Geary Boulevard between 33rd Avenue and Stanyan Street.

Geary is one of the busiest bus corridors in North America. The new transit lanes are building on the success of the Geary Rapid Project, which is making much-needed transit and safety improvements between Market and Stanyan streets and is now close to wrapping up construction --on time and on budget. Combined with the emergency transit lanes in the Richmond, 75% of the Geary corridor now has transit lanes.

The Geary corridor also features new wooden sidewalk extensions at some of the 38R Geary Rapid’s busiest bus stops. These temporary extensions allow buses to stay in the transit lane when picking up and dropping off passengers, making them more accessible and reliable.

Passengers board a 38R Geary Rapid in the Richmond District with the help of a temporary wooden "bus bulb."
Passengers board a 38R Geary Rapid in the Richmond District with the help of a temporary wooden "bus bulb."

After the temporary emergency transit lanes were installed, they were evaluated using several criteria, including recommendations we heard from the community to ensure that the improvements aren’t creating unintended problems. Metrics we looked at included bus travel times, bus crowding and effects on vehicle traffic.

Some of the key takeaways are:

  • Transit lanes have improved 38 Geary bus performance despite increasing traffic. In spring 2021, after transit lanes were installed, 38/38R Geary travel times were up to 4% quicker than in fall 2020 just before the lanes were installed, and up to 13% quicker compared with pre-COVID levels.
  • Minimal traffic impacts to Geary Boulevard or parallel streets. While we did see reduced traffic speeds on Geary Boulevard between fall 2020 (before the lanes were installed) and spring 2021 (after lanes were installed), those reductions were similar to speed changes we observed on control streets 25th Avenue and Arguello Boulevard. Notably, streets parallel to Geary Boulevard experienced even smaller speed reductions, indicating that diversions to other streets have likely been minimal.
  • A majority of people who took our evaluation survey support making the transit lanes permanent. 52% of the over 700 people surveyed supported maintaining the lanes; 15% were neutral or unsure; while 33% were opposed.

Considering the positive evaluation findings and support for maintaining the transit lanes,  we are proposing to make them permanent. The legislation for doing so will be presented to the SFMTA Board of Directors, likely in July 2021.

Learn more about the evaluation results and next steps on the project webpage.

Project staff will also host a “Virtual Office Hours” session on Wednesday, June 30 between 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. to answer questions about the evaluation results and next steps.

Revised Geary Boulevard Improvement Project design

The Geary Boulevard Improvement Project (Phase 2 of Geary BRT) had previously envisioned transit lanes in the center of the street between Arguello Boulevard and 28th Avenue. In light of the emergency transit lane evaluation results and other factors, the SFMTA is now pursuing a revised side-running design, which could include additional transit lanes, bus stop modifications and safety improvements. Outreach to seek input on these changes is planned for later this year.



Published June 17, 2021 at 03:01AM
https://ift.tt/2S6kuMK

Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

Review sách Hackers IELTS Reading

Sách “Hackers IELTS” phù hợp cho bạn đang muốn tự ôn luyện tại nhà nhưng không biết nên chọn sách nào học cho hiệu quả và khoa học. Bộ sách “Hackers IELTS” được các chuyên gia tin tưởng giới thiệu cho những bạn chưa biết gì về IELTS, không biết cấu trúc đề thi IELTS gồm những phần nào,…thì “Hackers IELTS” rất phù hợp với những đối tượng này. Xem thêm bài viết đang được quan tâm nhất: Review sách... Bạn hoàn toàn có thể đạt 6.5 IELTS trở lên là điều không khó nếu như bạn biết cách sắp xếp lộ trình học sao cho logic và thêm việc lựa chọn 1 vài tài liệu thực sự hay và dễ học, thì mọi nút thắt đều được gỡ bỏ. Hàng nghìn độc giả đã mua và nêu cảm nhận rất tốt về bộ sách này chính là minh chứng cho việc “Hackers IELTS” sẽ giúp bạn làm được điều mà bạn mong ước. Review sách Hackers IELTS Reading Nội dung chính BOOK REVIEW “Hackers IELTS” Giới thiệu chung Ưu điểm Bố cục mỗi bài gồm Khuyết điểm Kết luận BOOK REVIEW  “Hackers IELTS” Tên sách: Hackers IELTS Reading Nhà xuất bản: Nhà xuất bản ...

[ACE THE TEST] GIẢI ĐỀ WRITING NGÀY 09/07/2022

Task 1: The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011.  The graphs show information on various garbage disposal techniques used in a certain nation between 1960 and 2011. Overall, the quantity of paper, food, and other garbage that was disposed of significantly decreased throughout the time period. Contrarily, a greater proportion of plastic, wood, and food was discarded by consumers. An additional point is that the disposal of other things stayed fairly steady. Initially, a quarter of paper was thrown away in 1960, but in 2011 this percentage decreased by 10%. Concerning textiles, this sector likewise had a minor drop of 6% (from 17% to 11%) during the same time period. Additionally, in 2011 people eliminated 3 times less additional waste than the original figure of 13%. Furthermore, it is evident that compared to 2010, the amount of plastic and food waste increased by nearly 10% in 2011. Additionally, consumers d...

TỔNG HỢP BÀI MẪU IELTS WRITING QUÝ 2/2022 

Đây là tổng hợp đề thi thật IELTS Writing Quý 2/2022 và kèm bài giải cùng phân tích chi tiết, các bạn đã đăng kí và chuẩn bị thi trong quý 3/2022 cùng tham khảo và luyện tập thật kĩ nhé. Ngày 07/05/2022 Task 1: The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.  Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.  The two maps detail the town of Pebbleton 20 years in the past and the present day. Overall, Pebbleton has grown exponentially with the expansion of road infrastructure , as well as the building of additional dwellings and recreational amenities , changing the town into a more urbanised one. Initially, Pebbleton was an undeveloped peninsula connected to the mainland through Roadbridge, which was the only route to get to school on the opposite side of the river 20 years ago. A playing field ran horizontally along Old Ford Road in the central section, and a film studio filled the sout...