Chuyển đến nội dung chính

Residents Overwhelmingly Support Slow Streets

Residents Overwhelmingly Support Slow Streets
By Eillie Anzilotti

Photo of sign that indicates a slow street is in effect

After over a year of Slow Streets providing safe, low-volume corridors for people to walk, bike, play and travel during the pandemic, we’re excited to share our first comprehensive evaluation of the program. The key takeaway? San Franciscans are overwhelmingly in support of Slow Streets.

Slow Streets are designed to limit through traffic on certain residential streets and allow them to be used as a shared roadway for people traveling by foot and by bicycle. Since introducing Slow Streets in April 2020 in response to the Mayor’s Emergency Health Order, SFMTA has designated around 30 corridors covering 47 miles of roadway as Slow Streets. The program has evolved from a critical component of San Francisco’s pandemic response and recovery to a potential new avenue to further the city and SFMTA’s goals around climate action and sustainable transportation.

As the Slow Streets program has grown, we wanted to make sure we were understanding its impact on residents and city streets. Over the course of the program, we sent out a mail survey to anyone living within 0.25 mile of a Slow Street. We received over 15,000 responses on overall opinions of the program, how frequently residents use the streets, their experience when doing so and if they’d like to see the program continue. In tandem, we analyzed data on traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, collisions, bicycling and pedestrian volumes and spillover traffic impacts on adjacent streets to understand how the Slow Streets designation is changing conditions along the corridors.Through this initial evaluation, we were able to answer some of the main questions about Slow Streets that have come up over the past year and a half:

How do people feel about Slow Streets?

Residents who responded to the survey overwhelmingly supported the program. And, they noticed improvements in safety across the board: 71% agree that a street designated as a Slow Street became safer after the change.

Do Slow Streets impact traffic conditions on surrounding streets?

Our analysis of traffic data on adjacent streets shows that overall, Slow Streets do not cause an increase in traffic. We recognize, though, that COVID impacted traffic volumes throughout the city and we will continue to monitor for impacts as traffic conditions evolve.

Does a Slow Street designation make the road safer?

Of the Slow Streets in the network, 100% met the baseline conditions for a low-stress facility—fewer than 3,000 average daily vehicles and typical vehicle speeds of less than 25 mph. After a street is designated as a Slow Street, it sees, on average, a 35% decrease in daily traffic and a 14% decrease in vehicle speeds—along with a 36% decrease, on average, in collisions across the network.

Do Slow Streets encourage more people to walk or bike? In evaluating the Slow Streets program, we saw a virtuous cycle unfold: The less traffic on the street, the more likely people are to use it for biking and walking—and the more people use the street for safe and sustainable transport and play, the more likely others are to join in. Seeing young people learning to ride bikes on a number of Slow Streets was a sign that the roads were safe enough for all users. 

This Evaluation Summary shows data spanning from June 2020 through July 2021 for each of the corridors in the program, with a handful of exceptions that are outlined in the report. 

Next Steps

As San Francisco continues to move through the COVID-19 crisis, we are beginning the process of transitioning Slow Streets to from an emergency response measure to an ongoing program. We were able to use the data shown in this report to determine the first four corridors to remain in place after the pandemic: Sanchez Street, Shotwell Street, Golden Gate Avenue, and Lake Street. More information about the plans for these streets is available at Post-Pandemic Slow Streets.

We will continue to evaluate all existing Slow Streets to determine their post-pandemic future. To learn more about the overall program, visit Slow Streets.



Published September 25, 2021 at 04:44AM
https://ift.tt/3CHm8Gc

Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

Đảm bảo tiêu chí Coherence và Cohesion trong IELTS Writing

Coherence & Cohesion là một trong bốn tiêu chí chủ chốt để đánh giá bài IELTS Speaking và Writing . Trong bài viết dưới đây, mời các bạn cùng IELTS Vietop tham khảo lại định nghĩa và những cách để đảm bảo tiêu chí Coherence và Cohesion trong IELTS Writing nhé! Tiêu chí Coherence và Cohesion trong IELTS Writing là gì? Tiêu chí Coherence & Cohesion là hai khía cạnh quan trọng trong việc đánh giá và phân tích một bài IELTS Writing. Trong đó: Tiêu chí Coherence và Cohesion trong IELTS Writing là gì Coherence (tính liên kết): Mức độ mà các ý tưởng trong văn bản liên kết với nhau một cách hợp lý và có tổ chức. Nó đảm bảo rằng các ý tưởng trong văn bản được trình bày theo một cách mạch lạc và dễ hiểu. Người viết cần sử dụng các từ nối, cụm từ, và cấu trúc câu hợp lý để giúp cho các ý tưởng trong văn bản được trình bày một cách logic và mạch lạc. Cohesion (tính gắn kết): Mức độ mà các câu trong văn bản gắn kết với nhau một cách hợp lý và tự nhiên. Nó đảm bảo rằng các câu t...

Talk about generation gap – Bài mẫu IELTS Speaking part 1, 2, 3

Talk about generation gap là dạng đề bài không quá dễ dàng đối với các bạn đang ôn luyện thi IELTS . Để có thể làm tốt chủ đề này, thí sinh cần nắm chắc từ vựng và cấu trúc về chủ đề Generation Gap (Chênh lệch thế hệ). Hôm nay, IELTS Vietop sẽ cung cấp cho bạn Talk about generation gap – Bài mẫu IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, 3. 1. Từ vựng Talk about generation gap Generation gap /ˌʤɛnəˈreɪʃən ɡæp/ (n): Khác biệt thế hệ Ageism / ˈeɪˈʤɪɪzᵊm/ (n): Phân biệt đối xử dựa trên độ tuổi Technology divide / tɛkˈnɑləʤi dɪˈvaɪd/ (n): Sự khác biệt về sử dụng công nghệ Cultural shift /ˈkʌlʧərəl ʃɪft/ (n): Sự thay đổi văn hóa Traditional values /trəˈdɪʃənəl ˈvæljuz/ (n): Giá trị truyền thống Intergenerational conflict /ˌɪntərˈʤɛnəˈreɪʃənəl ˈkɑnflɪkt/ (n): Xung đột đa thế hệ Communication breakdown /kəmˌjunəˈkeɪʃən ˈbreɪkˌdaʊn/ (n): Mất liên lạc trong giao tiếp Respect for elders /rɪˈspɛkt fɔr ˈɛldərz/ (n): Sự tôn trọng người lớn tuổi Lifestyle differences /ˈlaɪfˌstaɪl ˈdɪfərənsɪz/ (n)...

Reading Practice: Toxic stress a slow wear and tear

A. Our bodies are built to respond when under attack. When we sense danger, our brain goes on alert, our heart rate goes up, and our organs flood with stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. We breathe faster, taking in more oxygen, muscles tense, our senses are sharpened and beads of sweat appear. This combination of reactions to stress is also known as the “fight-or-flight” response because it evolved as a survival mechanism, enabling people and other mammals to react quickly to life-threatening situations. The carefully orchestrated yet near-instantaneous sequence of hormonal changes and physiological responses helps someone to fight the threat off or flee to safety. Unfortunately, the body can also overreact to stressors that are not life-threatening, such as traffic jams, work pressure, and family difficulties. B. That’s all fine when we need to jump out of the way of a speeding bus, or when someone is following us down a dark alley. In those cases, our stress is considere...